People: Emily E. Barker, Associate

Photo of Emily E. Barker, Associate

Emily E. Barker

Associate

San Francisco
Direct: (415) 732-1141
0
Ms. Barker is a senior associate in the San Francisco office of Seyfarth Shaw LLP.  A member of the Labor & Employment department, she represents management in a broad range of labor and employment matters.  Her practice is focused on employment litigation and includes the defense of class, collective, Private Attorneys General Act, multi-plaintiff and single-plaintiff actions arising out of alleged violations of Title VII, California Labor Code, the Fair Labor Standards Act and state statutes prohibiting discrimination and harassment in employment.
 
In addition to her litigation practice, Ms. Barker counsels employers in all areas of Labor and Employment law, including the California Fair Employment and Housing Act, Title VII, the Americans with Disabilities Act, California Labor Code, the Fair Labor Standards Act, and other state and federal statutes.  Ms. Barker likewise provides day-to-day counseling, policy review, and advice to clients regarding the interface of state and federal law with the employment relationship, including employee exempt-status classification, wage and hour requirements, employee complaints, workplace investigations, leaves of absence and the interactive process.
 
Prior to joining Seyfarth Shaw, Ms. Barker served as law clerk to the Honorable Chief Justice Paul Reiber of the Vermont Supreme Court.  During law school, Ms. Barker externed for Associate Chief Administrative Law Judge Mary Miller Cracraft at the National Labor Relations Board Division of Judges and for the Honorable Carlos Bea of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.  Ms. Barker has also authored several published law review articles, she has been interviewed and quoted as legal authority by the BNA and her scholarship has been cited by the American Law Reports.
Ms. Barker is a senior associate in the San Francisco office of Seyfarth Shaw LLP.  A member of the Labor & Employment department, she represents management in a broad range of labor and employment matters.  Her practice is focused on employment litigation and includes the defense of class, collective, Private Attorneys General Act, multi-plaintiff and single-plaintiff actions arising out of alleged violations of Title VII, California Labor Code, the Fair Labor Standards Act and state statutes prohibiting discrimination and harassment in employment.
 
In addition to her litigation practice, Ms. Barker counsels employers in all areas of Labor and Employment law, including the California Fair Employment and Housing Act, Title VII, the Americans with Disabilities Act, California Labor Code, the Fair Labor Standards Act, and other state and federal statutes.  Ms. Barker likewise provides day-to-day counseling, policy review, and advice to clients regarding the interface of state and federal law with the employment relationship, including employee exempt-status classification, wage and hour requirements, employee complaints, workplace investigations, leaves of absence and the interactive process.
 
Prior to joining Seyfarth Shaw, Ms. Barker served as law clerk to the Honorable Chief Justice Paul Reiber of the Vermont Supreme Court.  During law school, Ms. Barker externed for Associate Chief Administrative Law Judge Mary Miller Cracraft at the National Labor Relations Board Division of Judges and for the Honorable Carlos Bea of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.  Ms. Barker has also authored several published law review articles, she has been interviewed and quoted as legal authority by the BNA and her scholarship has been cited by the American Law Reports.

Education

  • J.D., University of California, Hastings College of the Law

    magna cum laude
    Thurston Society
    Executive Managing Editor, Constitutional Law Quarterly
    Academic Excellence Scholarship Recipient
    CALI and Witkin Awards in State & Local Govt. Law  and Art Law
    Snodgrass Moot Court Competition: Semi-Finalist for Best Brief & Best Oral Argument

  • B.A., University of California, Santa Cruz

Admissions

  • California

Affiliations

  • Executive Committee member, San Francisco Bar Association Barrister’s Club, Labor and Employment Section
  • American Bar Association
  • California Bar Association, Labor and Employment Section
  • San Francisco Bar Association, Labor and Employment Section
  • San Francisco Bar Association Barrister’s Club

Representative Engagements

Complex/Class Action
 
  • Ribeiro v. Sedgwick, No. 3:16-CV-4507 WHA (U.S. District Court, Northern District of California) (ongoing defense of putative class action brought by partner against her law firm alleging gender discrimination and equal pay claims under federal, California and Illinois laws)
  • Hernandez v. General Electric Company, No. 113CV243623 (Santa Clara County Superior Court) (drafted successful opposition to motion for class certification and oversaw successful Pick Up Stix campaign in putative class action with allegations of unpaid wages on behalf of equipment service workers)
  • Cook v. United Insurance Co. of America, No. C 10-00425 (Contra Costa County Superior Court) (drafted and argued opposition to class certification, Vinole motion to deny certification, and motion for summary judgment in class action involving insurance sales agents alleging unreimbursed business expenses, unlawful deductions, unpaid vacation and derivative claims)
  • Watson v. Regis Corporation, No. 2:15-cv-01484 SVW-JCx (U.S. District Court, Central District of California) (drafted opposition to motion for class certification in putative class action involving allegations of missed meal and rest breaks, unpaid overtime wages, split shift issues, inaccurate wage statements and waiting time penalties)
  • Bland v. Telecare Corporation, No. RG16811450 (Alameda County Superior Court) (ongoing defense of putative class action brought by employees of a healthcare provider alleging unpaid overtime, reporting time, meal and rest break, wage statement and other wage and hour claims)
  • Covillo, et al. vs. Specialty's Cafe & Bakery, Inc., No. 11-CV-00594 DMR (U.S. District Court, Northern District of California) (drafted mediation brief and appeal of denial of motion to compel arbitration in putative class action involving allegations of unpaid wages and missed breaks on behalf of retail bakery/café workers)
  • Stano, et al. v. IPC International, No. SACV12-88 DOC (RNBx) (U.S. District Court, Central District of California) (drafted opposition to class certification and Vinole motion to deny certification in putative class action involving security guards and alleging unpaid wages, overtime violations arising from off the clock work, illegal rounding, and donning and doffing, meal and rest break violations, and derivative claims)
  • Cordy v. USS-POSCO Industries, et al., No. 12-CV-00553 EDL (U.S. District Court, Northern District of California) (drafted mediation brief in putative class action involving allegations of unpaid wages and missed breaks on behalf of steel workers)
  • Campbell, et al. v. Americantours International, LLC, No. CGC 12-527089 (San Francisco County Superior Court) (drafted mediation brief and oversaw successful Pick Up Stix campaign in putative class action brought by tour directors alleging misclassification and derivative minimum wage, overtime, meal periods and rest break claims)
  • Cozzitorto, et al. v. American Automobile Association of Northern California, Nevada & Utah, No. C13-02656 (Contra Costa County Superior Court) (ongoing defense of putative class action involving allegations of independent contractor misclassification and breach of contract)
  • Bergeron v. Clorox Manufacturing Company, No. RG15761191 (Alameda County Superior Court) (defended putative California Labor Code class action resolved on individual basis)
  • Eddings, et al. v. DS Waters of America, Inc., et al., No. 3:15-cv-2576 (U.S. District Court, Northern District of California) (oversaw successful Pick Up Stix campaign in putative class action involving allegations of misclassification and derivative overtime, minimum wage, meal and rest, wage statement, and waiting time penalties claims)
  • Bicek v. C&S Wholesale Grocers, et al., No. 2:13-cv-00411-MCE-KJN (U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California) (defended alleged misclassification of warehouse supervisor roles per exempt status)
  • Martinez v. Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc., No. CGC-10-497594 (San Francisco County Superior Court) (drafted motion for summary judgment in putative class action involving allegations of unpaid wages and missed breaks)
  • Holmes v. Xpress Global Systems, Inc., No. 34-3015-00180822 (Sacramento County Superior Court) (oversaw successful Pick Up Stix campaign in putative class action brought on behalf of delivery drivers alleging meal, rest, and wage statement claims)
 
Single Plaintiff
  • Virtusio v. Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc., No. CV 12 0602 NC (U.S. District Court, Northern District of California) (won full summary judgment with fees to defendant against employee alleging breach of contract, failure to pay wages, and intentional infliction of emotional distress)
  • [withheld] v. Allianz North America (won JAMS arbitration in breach of contract action brought by former executive with fees to respondent employer)
  • Bajrami v. J.P.Morgan Chase & Co., No. CGC-14-540622 (San Francisco County Superior Court) (ongoing defense of FEHA claims for discrimination, harassment and retaliation based on religion, sex, race and national origin)
  • Benson v. Tesoro Refining and Mktng. Co., LLC, No. 3:14-cv-05240 JSC (U.S. District Court, Northern District of California) (defended disability discrimination matter brought by former refinery worker)
  • Parker v. Regis Corporation, No. CIV RS 1110206 (San Bernardino County Superior Court) (defended pregnancy discrimination claim brought by former hair stylist)
  • Khazal v. J.P.Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., No. 4:13-CV-04076 PJH (U.S. District Court, Northern District of California) (defended wrongful termination, minimum wage and overtime claims brought by former employee)
  • Dong v. Various, Inc., et al. No. 13-CV-02992 BLF (U.S. District Court, Northern District of California) (defended discrimination claims brought by former employee under the FMLA, FEHA and CFRA)
  • Pizza v. Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc., No. C-13-0688-MMC (U.S. District Court, Northern District of California) (defended action alleging breach of fiduciary duty and retaliation under ERISA)
 
Appellate Advocacy
  • Virtusio v. Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, No. 13-16153/14-15834 (U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit) (served as appellate counsel in successful defense of employee’s appeal of full summary judgment and fees awarded to the employer. Role included drafting appellate brief and conducting oral argument before the panel.)
  • Hilmar Cheese Company v. The Superior Court of Merced Co., No. F074174 (California, 5th Dist. Court of Appeal) (drafted writ to prevent court-ordered unconstitutional search of employees)
  • Cook v. United Ins. Co. of America, No. A139456 (California 2nd Dist. Court of Appeal) (drafted appeal of denial of motion to compel arbitration in putative wage hour class action with Private Attorneys General Act claims)
  • Covillo, et al. vs. Specialty's Cafe & Bakery, Inc., No. 12-16884 (U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit) (drafted appeal of denial of motion to compel arbitration in putative wage hour class action)
  • Dizon v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, No. A134739 (California 1st Dist. Court of Appeal) (drafted writ return in support of motion to compel arbitration)

Publications