People: Christopher J. DeGroff, Partner

Christopher J. DeGroff

Partner

Chicago
Direct: (312) 460-5982
Fax: (312) 460-7982
0

Christopher J. DeGroff is a partner of Seyfarth Shaw LLP, a leading national labor and employment law firm.  Mr. DeGroff, a member of the Labor and Employment Practice Group in the Firm’s Chicago office and is Co-Chair of the Firm’s Complex Discrimination Litigation Practice Group.  Mr. DeGroff represents employers throughout the country in a wide range of employment law matters largely focused on multi-plaintiff and class/collective actions.  Mr. DeGroff also manages numerous single-plaintiff matters in this area for institutional clients.

Mr. DeGroff’s class action experience spans the entire scope of employment law theories, including claims of race, age and gender discrimination, sexual harassment, retaliation, and wage and hour matters.  Mr. DeGroff has leveraged this experience with the talents of others operating in high impact class-action teams to secure dismissal of substantial multi-plaintiff claims.  In addition, when it has advantaged the employer, he has structured complex case-resolution strategies for the efficient disposition of otherwise costly actions.

Mr. DeGroff also has extensive experience litigating against the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, both at the early charge stage, administrative subpoena enforcement actions, and in large-scale EEOC pattern-and-practice litigation.  He has developed innovative strategies for addressing wide-ranging governmental requests for information and has handled complex regional and national EEOC investigations and negotiations, typically resulting in no action being taken against our clients at all.  When the EEOC has resorted to litigation, Mr. DeGroff has been instrumental in defending our clients against these often high-profile systemic cases, working with any number of class action teams to achieve efficient and effective case resolution.  Mr. DeGroff is routinely asked to speak on emerging EEOC issues and has been quoted and published on this and related topics.

Mr. DeGroff’s class experience also includes a significant understanding of emerging electronic discovery issues, including spearheading the briefing and argument on a controversial class action cost-shifting issue related to electronic discovery, securing one of the most employer-favorable published opinions concerning how costs are shared by the parties.

Beyond this litigation experience, Mr. DeGroff routinely counsels employers on mass layoffs, plant closing, harassment investigations, employment contracts and numerous other areas – counseling that has allowed clients to avoid litigation in the first instance.  As a member of the Business Restructuring and Transactional Employment practice, Mr. DeGroff identifies employment obligations, liabilities and risks in the business restructuring context and provides detailed statutory compliance advice.  He also provides legal advice and practical assistance with employee communications and potential separation issues arising in the business restructuring context.

Christopher J. DeGroff is a partner of Seyfarth Shaw LLP, a leading national labor and employment law firm.  Mr. DeGroff, a member of the Labor and Employment Practice Group in the Firm’s Chicago office and is Co-Chair of the Firm’s Complex Discrimination Litigation Practice Group.  Mr. DeGroff represents employers throughout the country in a wide range of employment law matters largely focused on multi-plaintiff and class/collective actions.  Mr. DeGroff also manages numerous single-plaintiff matters in this area for institutional clients.

Mr. DeGroff’s class action experience spans the entire scope of employment law theories, including claims of race, age and gender discrimination, sexual harassment, retaliation, and wage and hour matters.  Mr. DeGroff has leveraged this experience with the talents of others operating in high impact class-action teams to secure dismissal of substantial multi-plaintiff claims.  In addition, when it has advantaged the employer, he has structured complex case-resolution strategies for the efficient disposition of otherwise costly actions.

Mr. DeGroff also has extensive experience litigating against the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, both at the early charge stage, administrative subpoena enforcement actions, and in large-scale EEOC pattern-and-practice litigation.  He has developed innovative strategies for addressing wide-ranging governmental requests for information and has handled complex regional and national EEOC investigations and negotiations, typically resulting in no action being taken against our clients at all.  When the EEOC has resorted to litigation, Mr. DeGroff has been instrumental in defending our clients against these often high-profile systemic cases, working with any number of class action teams to achieve efficient and effective case resolution.  Mr. DeGroff is routinely asked to speak on emerging EEOC issues and has been quoted and published on this and related topics.

Mr. DeGroff’s class experience also includes a significant understanding of emerging electronic discovery issues, including spearheading the briefing and argument on a controversial class action cost-shifting issue related to electronic discovery, securing one of the most employer-favorable published opinions concerning how costs are shared by the parties.

Beyond this litigation experience, Mr. DeGroff routinely counsels employers on mass layoffs, plant closing, harassment investigations, employment contracts and numerous other areas – counseling that has allowed clients to avoid litigation in the first instance.  As a member of the Business Restructuring and Transactional Employment practice, Mr. DeGroff identifies employment obligations, liabilities and risks in the business restructuring context and provides detailed statutory compliance advice.  He also provides legal advice and practical assistance with employee communications and potential separation issues arising in the business restructuring context.

Education

  • J.D., Indiana University School of Law (1996)
  • B.A., Indiana University (1992)

Admissions

  • Indiana
  • Illinois

Courts

  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
  • U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois
  • U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
  • U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
  • U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
  • U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
  • U.S. District Court for the Western District of Arkansas
  • U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
  • U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado
     

Affiliations

  • American Bar Association
  • Chicago Bar Association
  • Society of Human Resources Professionals, Member of Legislative Committee

Representative Engagements

Representative Complex Litigation Matters

  • EEOC v. Global Horizons, Inc., No. 11-CV-257 (U.S. District Court/ District of Hawaii) (EEOC pattern or practice lawsuit alleging discrimination in the terms and conditions of employment of Thai and Cambodian workers brought to Hawaii to work on coffee plantations).
  • EEOC v. Outback Steakhouse Restaurants, Inc. (U.S.D.C. - D. Colorado) (EEOC pattern or practice case alleging gender discrimination in pay and promotions; negotiated favorable consent decree)
  • EEOC v. Temple Inland, Inc. (U.S.D.C. - D. Arizona) (EEOC pattern or practice age claim involving high level facility executives; negotiated favorable consent decree)
  • EEOC v. Jillian’s Entertainment Corp. (U.S.D.C. - S.D. Ind.) (summary judgment in landmark nationwide reverse sex discrimination pattern-and-practice hiring case)
  • EEOC v. Caterpillar Inc., (U.S.D.C - N.D. Ill.) (full defense verdict in pattern or practice sex harassment and retaliation case under Title VII)
  • EEOC v. Balance Staffing (U.S.D.C - N.D. Ill.) (EEOC pattern or practice case alleging disability discrimination in the hiring of employees; negotiated favorable consent decree)
  • EEOC v. McCormick & Schmick’s, Inc. (U.S.D.C - D. Maryland) (ongoing representation in EEOC pattern or practice case alleging race discrimination in hiring, pay, and promotions)
  • EEOC v. Quantum Foods, (U.S.D.C - N.D. Ill.) (EEOC administrative enforcement lawsuit with respect to a subpoena for documents which the Commission had served in connection with an administrative charge)
  • Merritt et al. v. WellPoint (U.S.D.C.- E.D. Va.) (favorable resolution of multi-facility, 153-plaintiff age discrimination case involving comprehensive reduction in force)
  • Wiginton v. CB Richard Ellis (U.S.D.C. - N.D. Ill.) (favorable resolution of nationwide sexual harassment class action case involving complex electronic discovery issues)
  • Morris, et al. v. Caterpillar Inc. (U.S.D.C. - C.D. Ill.) (favorable resolution of multi-facility, 42-plaintiff age discrimination case involving performance management system)
  • Hurley, et. al. v. Majestic Star Casino (U.S.D.C. – N.D. Ill.) (dismissal of wage and hour collective action involving FLSA overtime and maritime lien for wages)
  • Ellis, et al. v. Costco Wholesale Corp. (U.S.D.C. – N.D. Cal.) (nationwide class action for gender discrimination alleging denial of promotions)
  • Tjelle v. Caterpillar Inc. (Circuit Court of Cook County) (dismissal of putative multi-facility wage and hour class action); (U.S.D.C. – N.D. Ill.) (dismissal of companion FMLA action in Federal District Court)
  • Colindres, et al. v. Quietflex Manufacturing L.P., et al. (U.S.D.C. – S.D. Texas) (78-plaintiff national origin, retaliation and FLSA class action)

Other Representative Litigation Matters

  • Yeaman v. Caterpillar Inc. (U.S.D.C - D. Co.) (defense verdict in four-day jury trial involving sex discrimination claims under Title VII)
  • Ghosh v. Memorial Medical Center (Sangamon Circuit Court, Ill. Ct. App., Ill. S. Ct.) (dismissal of multi-theory discrimination/breach of contract case appealed through the Illinois Supreme Court); (U.S.D.C. – C.D.Ill., Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals) (affirming dismissal of companion national origin discrimination case in Federal District Court and Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals)
  • Howard v. Temple-Inland, Inc. (U.S.D.C. - N.D. Ill.) (dismissal of age discrimination case)
  • Morris v. Temple-Inland, Inc. (U.S.D.C. S.D. Ind.) (dismissal of race discrimination case)
  • Gates v. Caterpillar Inc. (U.S.D.C. – C.D. Ill.) (dismissal of retaliation and gender discrimination case)
  • Joyner v. Caterpillar Inc.(U.S.D.C. – C.D. Ill) (dismissal of age and gender discrimination case)
  • Hightower v. Majestic Star Casino (U.S.D.C. – N.D. Ind.) (dismissal of race, age and gender discrimination case)
  • Pohl v. United Airlines (U.S.D.C. – S.D. Ind.) (dismissal of disability discrimination case, including district court judge’s published remarks commending defense counsel)
  • Remer v. United Airlines (U.S.D.C. – S.D. Ind.) (dismissal of age, gender and disability discrimination case)
  • HPA Monon-Recording Pay Arbitration (AAA Arbitration) (Arbitration award for employer in contract interpretation/reporting pay case)
  • Lamela v. Arlington Int’l Racecourse (AAA Arbitration) (Arbitration award for employer in just cause employee discharge case)
  • Bartels v. Arlington Int’l Racecourse (AAA Arbitration) (Arbitration award for employer in complex contract interpretation case)

Publications

Community Involvement

  • Gilda's Club Chicago - Board Member
  • Leukemia Research Foundation - Team Leader
  • Alphonsus Academy for the Arts - Board Member