David J.Kim
Associate
Labor & Employment
dakim@seyfarth.com
PROFILE
EXPERIENCE
NEWS & INSIGHTS
ACCOMPLISHMENTS
More About David
California employers must prioritize their business objectives, while also complying with a complex and evolving set of labor and employment laws. David collaborates with Seyfarth attorneys to develop legal solutions that are uniquely tailored to their clients’ goals and needs.
Education
Click to expand content section
Education
- JD, Southwestern Law School
Magna cum laude - BS, University of California-San Diego
Admissions
Click to expand content section
Admissions
- California
Related Services
Related Services
EXPERIENCE
Click to collapse content section
EXPERIENCE
- Obtained a published California Court of Appeal decision for Target affirming summary judgment on FEHA disability discrimination, failure-to-accommodate, and interactive-process claims. The court held that an employer’s knowledge of an employee’s disability is a threshold requirement for liability and knowledge of an undisclosed disability will not be imputed to the employer unless disability is the only reasonable interpretation of the known facts. See Husband v. Target Corp., 120 Cal.App.5th 762 (2026).
Publications
Click to expand content section
Publications
More About David
California employers must prioritize their business objectives, while also complying with a complex and evolving set of labor and employment laws. David collaborates with Seyfarth attorneys to develop legal solutions that are uniquely tailored to their clients’ goals and needs.
Education
Click to expand content section
Education
- JD, Southwestern Law School
Magna cum laude - BS, University of California-San Diego
Admissions
Click to expand content section
Admissions
- California
Related Services
Related Services
EXPERIENCE
Click to collapse content section
EXPERIENCE
- Obtained a published California Court of Appeal decision for Target affirming summary judgment on FEHA disability discrimination, failure-to-accommodate, and interactive-process claims. The court held that an employer’s knowledge of an employee’s disability is a threshold requirement for liability and knowledge of an undisclosed disability will not be imputed to the employer unless disability is the only reasonable interpretation of the known facts. See Husband v. Target Corp., 120 Cal.App.5th 762 (2026).
Publications
Click to expand content section
Publications