Legal Update
Nov 14, 2011
Issue 29: Supreme Court to Decide Constitutionality of Health Care Reform
This is the twenty-ninth issue in our health care reform series of alerts for employers on selected topics in health care reform. (Our general summary of health care reform and other issues in this series can be accessed by clicking here.) This series of Health Care Reform Management Alerts is designed to provide a more in-depth analysis of certain aspects of health care reform and how it will impact your employer-sponsored plans.
As anticipated, the US Supreme Court has agreed to hear arguments on the constitutionality of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA). After passage of PPACA, opponents immediately assailed its constitutionality, stating that the requirement for individuals to purchase insurance coverage exceeds Congress' power under the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution. Several cases were filed across the country, and as we have previously reported, conflicting decisions have come out of the District Courts and the Circuit Courts of Appeals. Some courts have ruled PPACA constitutional, others ruled it unconstitutional, and yet others have ruled that while the individual mandate is unconstitutional, the statute itself is constitutional.
The only Circuit Court of Appeals which, thus far, has found the individual mandate of statute unconstitutional is the 11th Circuit. On November 14th, the Supreme Court announced it will hear an appeal of the 11th Circuit decision in State of Florida v. US Department of Health and Human Services. Oral arguments are scheduled for March of 2012, and the court has set aside 5 1/2 hours of time for the parties. A decision is expected by July, prior to the November elections.
Set forth below is a scorecard of the cases challenging health care reform that have made their way up to the Circuit Courts of Appeals and their respective holdings or status:
Court |
Case |
Holding/ Status |
Date |
---|---|---|---|
3rd Circuit | New Jersey Physicians v. Obama | Dismissed for lack of standing | August 2011 |
4th Circuit | Virginia v. Sebelius; Liberty University, Inc. v. Timothy Geithner | Constitutional; also ruled that penalty for not complying with individual mandate is a tax that cannot be ruled upon until 2014. | September 2011 |
6th Circuit | Thomas More Law Center v. Obama | Constitutional | July 2011 |
8th Circuit | Kinder v. Geithner | Pending | Arguments in October 2011 |
9th Circuit | Baldwin and Pacific Justice Institute v. Sebelius | Pending | Arguments in July 2011 |
11th Circuit | State of Florida v. US Department of Health and Human Services | Unconstitutional; however, individual mandate may be severed from statute leaving statute constitutional. | August 2011 |
DC Circuit | Susan Seven-Sky v. Holder | Constitutional | November 2011 |