Tenth Circuit Affirms Holding That An “Accidental” Oversight In a 204(h) Notice Was Neither “Egregious” Nor a Basis for a Promissory Estoppel Claim

In Jensen v. Solvay Chemicals, Inc., No. 11-8092 (July 2, 2013), the Tenth Circuit recently affirmed a district court’s determination that employees were not entitled to any relief for their employer’s violation of ERISA Section 204(h)’s notice requirements because the employees failed to establish that the notice deficiency was “egregious.”

To read this blog click here...