People: Camille A. Olson, Partner

Camille A. Olson

Partner

Chicago
Direct: (312) 460-5831
Fax: (312) 460-7831
0

Biography

Ms. Olson is a partner of Seyfarth Shaw LLP and a member of its National Labor and Employment Law Steering Committee and National Chairperson of its Complex Discrimination Litigation Practice Group.  She is the immediate past National Chairperson of the Labor and Employment Practice Department.  Her 25 years of practice have concentrated in all areas of litigation, with a concentration in complex labor and employment law, representing companies nationwide in challenges to the independent contractor status of workers, employment discrimination and harassment matters, and wage and hour matters. 
 

Ms. Olson’s trial experience includes lead defense trial counsel in “bet the company” harassment, discrimination, independent contractor, and wage and hour cases.  She has also served as outside counsel and independent counsel to individual members of Boards of Directors and Executive Team Members in connection with internal investigations and highly sensitive litigation matters. 

She has litigated numerous discrimination cases through both successful summary judgment motions and favorable jury verdicts in the context of EEOC pattern and practice multi-plaintiff cases, reductions in force, individual terminations, and harassment allegations.  Since 2008, Ms. Olson has been named as one of the Nation’s Most Powerful Employment Attorneys by Human Resource Executive and LawDragon.  She was also voted one of the Top Ten Women Business Lawyers in Illinois.  She is regularly lauded by commentaries for her effective litigation style, particularly in complex class discrimination matters.  Ms. Olson is consistently rated at the highest level by Chambers USA and Who’s Who Legal.  Chambers USA recently noted:  “Specializing in complex discrimination litigation, Camille Olson is ‘just terrific.’  Everything you hear about her is excellent and she handles the really cutting-edge stuff.”


Throughout the last ten years she has also regularly appeared before the United States Senate, the United States House of Representatives, the EEOC, and the United States Department of Labor on her own behalf (as a recognized expert in various fields), and on behalf of the United States Chamber of Commerce and the Society for Human Resource Management.  In these capacities she has provided the business perspective on proposed legislation to amend the following laws:  the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Equal Pay Act, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the application of white collar exemptions to the Fair Labor Standards Act, the Internal Revenue Code, and the Fair Credit Reporting Act.  For example, with respect to the Americans with Disabilities Act, throughout 2008 and 2009, Ms. Olson testified before the United States Senate in connection with the contemplated amendments to the Americans with Disabilities Act, provided guidance in crafting the ADA Amendments Act that became effective on January 1, 2009, provided training sessions on the new ADA throughout the country on behalf of the Society of Human Resources Management, and, in May, 2009 provided comments to the EEOC with respect to the upcoming ADA Amendments Act Regulations.

Ms. Olson has also worked closely with employer associations in connection with various issues relating to the OFCCP’s, EEOC’s, and U.S. Department of Labor’s enforcement policies and their effect on employers.  Ms. Olson submitted comments on behalf of a coalition of over 20,000 employers on the IRS’ Training Guide “Employee or Independent Contractor?”  She has also worked with the National Newspaper Association, the NAA, and the American Association of Independent News Distributors to successfully amend the Internal Revenue Code to add industry specific exemptions excluding newspaper distributors from the definition of employee.  In California, she has provided counsel to a number of state lobbying efforts in connection with the application of various child labor restrictions to newspaper solicitors.  She regularly represents newspaper associations as amicus curiae before various federal and state agencies on the issue of the appropriate factual and legal analysis to apply to independent contractor status.

Ms. Olson has also worked extensively with numerous associations on legal issues relating to the use of non-employee workers, including: Air Courier Conference of America; American Association of Meat Processors; Chicagoland Chamber of Commerce; Illinois Manufacturers’ Association; Illinois State Chamber of Commerce; Information Technology Association of America; The Management Association of Illinois; Messenger Courier Association of the Americas; Metropolitan Chicago Healthcare Council; National Association of the Remodeling Industry; National Public Employer Labor Relations Association; New England Newspaper Association; National Tour Association; Newspaper Association of America (NAA); Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce; Northern States Circulation Managers Association; Mississippi Circulation Managers Association; National Newspaper Association; the Iowa, Michigan, Pennsylvania and California Newspaper Publishers Association; Association of Free Community Papers; and Inland Press Association.

Ms. Olson is a frequent speaker on all human resource issues, and is co-editor of Guide to Employment Law Compliance published by Thompson (2009).  She has also published numerous articles and chapters on various labor issues, and speaks regularly nationally and internationally on complex litigation, discrimination, and non-employee worker matters.  She is co-editor of “An Overview of Wage and Hour Laws As They Apply to Newspapers” published by NAA, American Society of Newspaper Editors.  Monthly, Ms. Olson publishes a column titled “Ask Seyfarth” that answers a wide range of employment-related questions in The Inlander.  Recently, she has also been quoted on labor and employment issues in publications such as: The New York Times, The Daily Labor Report, The Chicago Tribune, Crains Chicago Business, The Wall Street Journal, Presstime, Editor & Publisher, HR Magazine,and HR Wire.  She has been described as “a media law whiz” in the San Francisco Daily Journal.

Ms. Olson is a partner of Seyfarth Shaw LLP and a member of its National Labor and Employment Law Steering Committee and National Chairperson of its Complex Discrimination Litigation Practice Group.  She is the immediate past National Chairperson of the Labor and Employment Practice Department.  Her 25 years of practice have concentrated in all areas of litigation, with a concentration in complex labor and employment law, representing companies nationwide in challenges to the independent contractor status of workers, employment discrimination and harassment matters, and wage and hour matters. 
 

Ms. Olson’s trial experience includes lead defense trial counsel in “bet the company” harassment, discrimination, independent contractor, and wage and hour cases.  She has also served as outside counsel and independent counsel to individual members of Boards of Directors and Executive Team Members in connection with internal investigations and highly sensitive litigation matters. 

She has litigated numerous discrimination cases through both successful summary judgment motions and favorable jury verdicts in the context of EEOC pattern and practice multi-plaintiff cases, reductions in force, individual terminations, and harassment allegations.  Since 2008, Ms. Olson has been named as one of the Nation’s Most Powerful Employment Attorneys by Human Resource Executive and LawDragon.  She was also voted one of the Top Ten Women Business Lawyers in Illinois.  She is regularly lauded by commentaries for her effective litigation style, particularly in complex class discrimination matters.  Ms. Olson is consistently rated at the highest level by Chambers USA and Who’s Who Legal.  Chambers USA recently noted:  “Specializing in complex discrimination litigation, Camille Olson is ‘just terrific.’  Everything you hear about her is excellent and she handles the really cutting-edge stuff.”


Throughout the last ten years she has also regularly appeared before the United States Senate, the United States House of Representatives, the EEOC, and the United States Department of Labor on her own behalf (as a recognized expert in various fields), and on behalf of the United States Chamber of Commerce and the Society for Human Resource Management.  In these capacities she has provided the business perspective on proposed legislation to amend the following laws:  the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Equal Pay Act, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the application of white collar exemptions to the Fair Labor Standards Act, the Internal Revenue Code, and the Fair Credit Reporting Act.  For example, with respect to the Americans with Disabilities Act, throughout 2008 and 2009, Ms. Olson testified before the United States Senate in connection with the contemplated amendments to the Americans with Disabilities Act, provided guidance in crafting the ADA Amendments Act that became effective on January 1, 2009, provided training sessions on the new ADA throughout the country on behalf of the Society of Human Resources Management, and, in May, 2009 provided comments to the EEOC with respect to the upcoming ADA Amendments Act Regulations.

Ms. Olson has also worked closely with employer associations in connection with various issues relating to the OFCCP’s, EEOC’s, and U.S. Department of Labor’s enforcement policies and their effect on employers.  Ms. Olson submitted comments on behalf of a coalition of over 20,000 employers on the IRS’ Training Guide “Employee or Independent Contractor?”  She has also worked with the National Newspaper Association, the NAA, and the American Association of Independent News Distributors to successfully amend the Internal Revenue Code to add industry specific exemptions excluding newspaper distributors from the definition of employee.  In California, she has provided counsel to a number of state lobbying efforts in connection with the application of various child labor restrictions to newspaper solicitors.  She regularly represents newspaper associations as amicus curiae before various federal and state agencies on the issue of the appropriate factual and legal analysis to apply to independent contractor status.

Ms. Olson has also worked extensively with numerous associations on legal issues relating to the use of non-employee workers, including: Air Courier Conference of America; American Association of Meat Processors; Chicagoland Chamber of Commerce; Illinois Manufacturers’ Association; Illinois State Chamber of Commerce; Information Technology Association of America; The Management Association of Illinois; Messenger Courier Association of the Americas; Metropolitan Chicago Healthcare Council; National Association of the Remodeling Industry; National Public Employer Labor Relations Association; New England Newspaper Association; National Tour Association; Newspaper Association of America (NAA); Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce; Northern States Circulation Managers Association; Mississippi Circulation Managers Association; National Newspaper Association; the Iowa, Michigan, Pennsylvania and California Newspaper Publishers Association; Association of Free Community Papers; and Inland Press Association.

Ms. Olson is a frequent speaker on all human resource issues, and is co-editor of Guide to Employment Law Compliance published by Thompson (2009).  She has also published numerous articles and chapters on various labor issues, and speaks regularly nationally and internationally on complex litigation, discrimination, and non-employee worker matters.  She is co-editor of “An Overview of Wage and Hour Laws As They Apply to Newspapers” published by NAA, American Society of Newspaper Editors.  Monthly, Ms. Olson publishes a column titled “Ask Seyfarth” that answers a wide range of employment-related questions in The Inlander.  Recently, she has also been quoted on labor and employment issues in publications such as: The New York Times, The Daily Labor Report, The Chicago Tribune, Crains Chicago Business, The Wall Street Journal, Presstime, Editor & Publisher, HR Magazine,and HR Wire.  She has been described as “a media law whiz” in the San Francisco Daily Journal.

Education

  • J.D., University of Michigan Law School (1983)
  • B.A., University of Michigan (1980)
    Recipient of Highest Honors Award, and Eita Krom Scholar in 1980 For Published Honors Thesis, later republished as, “Effort and Reward: The Assumption that College Grades are Affected by Quantity of Study,” Social Forces, June 1985, Volume 63, Number 4, p. 945-967.

Admissions

  • California
  • Illinois

Courts

  • United States Supreme Court
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth, Seventh, Eighth, Ninth and District of Columbia Circuits
  • U.S. District Courts for the Central, Eastern and Northern Districts of California
  • U.S. District Courts for the Northern and Central Districts of Illinois

Affiliations

  • American Bar Association (Labor and Employment Law Section)
  • Chicago Bar Association
  • The University Club of Chicago (Immediate Past President and Chairperson of its Board of Directors; Member, Board of Directors’ Long Range Planning Committee and Chairperson of Capital Campaign)
  • The University Club of Chicago Foundation (Member of Board of Directors)
  • The Women’s Board of United Cerebral Palsy (Board of Directors)
  • Society for Human Resource Management (Leadership Team; Frequent Speaker and Representative before EEOC and other federal regulatory agencies with respect to issues of importance to Human Resource Executives)
  • United States Chamber of Commerce (Member, Labor and Employment Policy Committee; Member of Subcommittee on Employment Non-Discrimination and FLSA Issues)
  • Inland Press Association (Member of Board of Directors (2001-2008); Chairperson of Human Resource Committee and Faculty Member of Circulation Academy (2001-present))
  • Newspaper Association of America (Member, Taxation Committee, Member, Human Resource Committee)
  • Part-Time Faculty Member at Loyola Law School

Representative Engagements

  • Helen M. Carter v. Hewlett-Packard Company, No. (D.C. Id. May 2010) (alleged worldwide class of women and older executives and directors allege age and sex discrimination in all aspects of employment)
  • Stephen G. Lingis et al. v. Motorola Inc., No. 03-5044 (N.D. Ill. June 2009) (summary judgment granted in ERISA class action on basis that the company was shielded from liability by plan participants under the safe harbor provision of ERISA)
  • Metty v. The Motorola Company, No. 05-CV- 9989 (D.C. Ill March, 2007) (multiple claims brought in two week jury trial against the Executive Team and CEO of Motorola resolved immediately following Defendant’s Motion for Directed Verdict in Chicago, Illinois)
  • EEOC v. The Dial Corp ., No. 02-CV-10109 (D.C. Iowa August, 2004) (EEOC pattern and practice disparate treatment and impact case brought challenging the use of a pre-employment testing device.)
  • EEOC v. The Dial Corp ., No. 99 C 3356 (N.D. Ill.) (EEOC alleged a pattern and practice of sexual harassment and sought relief on behalf of 101 employees; case resolved on the day of trial.)
  • Abbe, et al. v. Daewoo Motor America, Inc., Daewoo Motor Corp. Ltd., Daewoo Corporation (No. 99-09776 GAFCSHX M. D. Fl. 2000) (plaintiffs on behalf of themselves and approximately 6,000 commissioned sales representatives alleged the company inappropriately classified them as independent contractors, engaged in retaliatory discharge practices, and violated the FLSA by failing to pay them minimum wages and overtime; district court denied plaintiffs’ motion to proceed as a class on the basis of defendants’ position that the plaintiffs’ status as independent contractor/employee is not conducive to class litigation.) NOTE: Plaintiffs also filed numerous other separate class actions in California raising other legal issues, as well as IRS Form SS-8 Requests for Worker Classification Determinations that were handled by Seyfarth attorneys.
  • Adkins v. Mid America Growers , 167 F.3d 355 (7th Cir. 1999) (representative action by 200 farm workers for overtime and minimum wages; case dismissed following remand.)
  • Gibbs, et. al v. Daily Southtown Inc . and Pulitzer Community Newspapers, Inc. (No. 96 CH 1884 Circuit Court of Cook County, Chancery Division, 1st District 1997) (plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves, and an alleged class of distributors, alleged they were treated as employees not independent contractors, and that as a result, the company unlawfully deducted monies from their wages in violation of the Illinois Wage Payment and Collection Act, violated their individual employment agreements, improperly issued them IRS Form 1099s, and were deprived of other employee benefits. On eve of pending motion in opposition to class certification, named plaintiffs settled for nominal amount.)
  • Budd, et.al. v. Freedom Communications, Inc . (No. 96-D-238 D. Col.) (plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and 700 other non-employee workers brought seven claims against defendant, including antitrust law violations under the Sherman Antitrust Act, tortious interference with contract claims, breach of contracts, violation of state minimum wage and wage collection act laws, Labor Peace Act, fraudulent and negligent misrepresentations of workers’ alleged non-employee status to deprive them of various employee benefits, and breach of fiduciary duty. Class certification denied on the basis that the determination of the employment/independent contractor status of the plaintiffs was central to the complaint, and plaintiffs did not establish that their proposed class met the commonality, typicality, and adequacy of representation requirements of Rule 23(a).)
  • Cherry v. AT&T , 47 F.3d 225 (7th Cir. 1995) (affirming grant of summary judgment in employer’s favor on glass ceiling promotion claim brought by high-ranking executive.)
  • Coon Rapids Lincoln Mercury v. The Star Tribune Company, District Court of Hennepin County, Minnesota (national class action alleging consumer fraud and breach of contract claims) (case resolved while defendants’ motion for summary judgment was pending.)
  • Gustovich, et al. v. AT&T Communications, Inc ., 972 F.2d 845 (7th Cir. 1992) (summary judgment decision affirmed by Seventh Circuit applying ADEA standards in workforce reduction context to employees evaluated and rank ordered according to skills and needs of business.)
  • Bullock v. AT&T Communications. Inc ., 50 Fair Emp. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 407 (N.D. Ill. 1989) (summary judgment decision under ADEA and state law involving claims of high level EEO executive that company’s work force reduction programs discriminated against him personally and against others.)
  • Smith v. White Farm Equipment Company, A Division of Allied Products (N.D. Ohio 1989) (jury verdict for employer on ADEA claims of manager in reduction in force case.)
  • Smith v. Contra Costa Newspapers, Inc. (Knight Ridder) , (Contra Costa County Superior Court) (certified class action of over 8,000 non-employee workers alleging antitrust violations, breach of contract, unfair business practices, and lost earnings. On eve of pending motion in opposition to class certification, the case was resolved.
  • Gonzalez, et al. v. Freedom Communications, Inc. d/b/a The Orange County Register (Orange County Superior Court Case No. 03CC08756) (multi-count class action challenging the status of over 5,000 independent contractors on numerous bases.)